Submitted by zero (not verified) on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 02:58.
Mark's explanation to your doubt is right. This is called the inversion of the third conditional sentences. In any third conditional sentences you can use 'had' in replace to 'if' and the meaning more emphasatic than the normal one.
Mark's explanation to your doubt is right. This is called the inversion of the third conditional sentences. In any third conditional sentences you can use 'had' in replace to 'if' and the meaning more emphasatic than the normal one.